Figure 1
shows the current step in the evaluation methodology…
Figure 1 Showing the current step in the
methodology for evaluating a facility level energy storage deployment.
Figure 2 shows the load profile for the facility on the peak power consumption day of
the year at the facility. The dashed line in Figure 2 represents the new reduced peak that would be realized if either the LightSailRAES V1 or the Prudent VRB-ESS® were deployed. Conveniently, both devices have
the same power and energy rating, 250 kW and 1000 kWh (depending on the amount
of storage media) respectively. The equation for the new reduced peak at full
power is:
Figure 2 showing the Load profile on peak usage day
at the facility. The dashed line represents the peak that would be realized if
the energy storage device were operated at full power.
Using a 250 kW energy
storage device to reduce the 1,583 kW demand peak to a new shifted peak of 1,333
kW would require 1123 kWh of energy output from the device. In Figure 2 the area above the dashed line and below
the power usage curve represents the energy produced by the energy storage
device. As both devices are rated at 1 MWh, the power output of the device must
be reduced from the maximum rated output to a level that meets the 1MWh energy
limit of the device. MS Excel Goal Seek optimization can be used to determine
that a new shifted peak of 1,346 kW achieved by reducing the 1,583 kW demand
peak by 236 kW (instead of 250 kW) will accommodate the storage device’s 1 MWh
energy limit.
Repeating this goal
seek optimization for every day of available power/energy data will reveal the
new reduced peaks in each month. The monthly power reduction resulting from
energy storage is calculated using the following equation:
The
monetary savings of demand charge management through energy storage were
determined using the following equation:
Works Cited
Baxter, R. (2012, November 28). Author, Energy
Storage; a Nontechnical Guide. (M. Banta, Interviewer)
No comments:
Post a Comment